Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Firestone (70%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 80% of the Firestone Roadhawk 2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza 6 was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2024 225/45 R17 test, where both the Turanza 6 and the Roadhawk 2 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Recommended for economical driving | doporučené pro úspornou jízdu | ||||||
| Firestone Roadhawk 2 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
