Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're going to look at two prominent summer tyres: the Bridgestone Potenza S001 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127.
Starting with the Bridgestone Potenza S001, this tyre was rated third in the Autobild test out of 50 and ninth in the ADAC test out of 16 tyres. Among its best features, it shows a good performance with cross aquaplaning. However, it is worth mentioning that it has not received an official rating from our platform. To get more details about this tyre, you can visit here. Bridgestone, known for their high-quality tyres, is a reputable manufacturer. You can explore more about their products here.
Then moving on to the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, it secured the 10th position in an Autobild test involving 50 tyres and came 14th in the ADAC test out of a total of 16 tyres. Despite this, it shows a decent rating of 74% on our platform, indicating a respectable overall performance. It is a high-grade Ultra High Performance summer tyre that is manufactured in Korea. Additionally, it's worth noting that it's original equipment for high-end models like Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3. You can find more details on the Hankook Ventus here. As for Hankook as a brand, they offer a wide range of high-quality tyres, which you can check out here.
In summary, both tyres show desirable features and impressive performance. The Bridgestone Potenza S001 stands out for great performance in cross aquaplaning whereas Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is noted for its overall performance and for being original equipment for some prestigious car models. Comparatively, in mutual tests, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 generally ranks higher than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. However, considering all factors, it's up to you to decide which tyre best suits your individual driving style and requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
