Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are comparing two summer tyres: the Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the Falken Azenis FK510.
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 tyre shines in testing against a large pool of competitors, impressively positioning 3rd out of 50 tyres in the Autobild test, and 9th out of 16 in the ADAC test. This tyre's standout strength is in 'Aquaplaning - cross'. This highlights the tyre's effectiveness at preventing hydroplaning, a crucial safety feature for wet road conditions, a feature that enhances safety significantly by maintaining grip and preventing loss of control.
On the other hand, the Falken Azenis FK510 located further down the test ranks, sitting at 15th out of 50 in the Autobild test, and 8th out of 16 in the ADAC test. However, the Falken tyre shows remarkable strengths in 'Exterior noise', 'Price/value', and 'Rolling resistance'. The quietness of the tyre, combined with the good value for money and low rolling resistance makes this a noteworthy tyre for those looking to enhance fuel efficiency and comfort.
Despite the Falken Azenis FK510 model's commendable performance, the data suggests that there's room for improvement - perhaps this has been achieved in the Falken's new model, the Azenis FK520 which replaced the FK510.
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 demonstrates strong performance across various testing parameters. It proves its prowess in resisting aquaplaning, a crucial feature for safety. On the other hand, the Falken Azenis FK510 shines in its value for money, comfort levels (as indicated by lower exterior noise), and potential for better fuel efficiency enabled by lower rolling resistance.
Ultimately, the decision between the two depends on the driver’s priorities. If your focus is on wet road safety, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is a better choice. However, if you are seeking a quiet, comfortable and fuel-efficient drive, consider the Falken Azenis FK510. Both tyres are quality options, each with their strengths and focus areas. Choose based on what is more relevant to your specific requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
