Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza RE050 I vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nokian (66%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza RE050 I has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza RE050 I
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
