Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the Cargo UltraGrip 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 also have C wet ratings.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |