Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than GT (37%). Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2015 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | velmi doporučeno | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,7 | podmíněně doporučeno | 7,2 | 7,8 | 8,2 | 7,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||