Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has C wet grip rating, whereas 88% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 98,4 | 99,4 | 100 | 98,4 | 98,8 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,2 | velmi doporučeno | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | |
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,2 | velmi doporučeno | 9,4 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 | |
Show test details |