Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Bridgestone (75%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the Winter Sport 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 98,7 | 98,7 | 98,1 | 100 | 99 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,2 | velmi doporučeno | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | |
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: - | 9,0 | Velmi doporučeno | 9,2 | 9,0 | 9,2 | 8,4 | |
Show test details |