14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 53% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /88%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /53%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 166

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 60%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 65%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 82%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,4	2,9	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	7,1	6,9	6,7	5	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,9	2,7	2,4	3,0	2,0	2,4
Show test details

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	8,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Falken EuroWinter HS01	33,9	26,1
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands