Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Uniroyal (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the MS plus 77 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2- | 3 | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,3 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,7 | 3,3 | 1,7 | 2,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2- | 3+ | 1- | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
