14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Bridgestone (93%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (81%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 also have B wet ratings.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 16x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.75

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

87%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 90%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 76%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

65%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

77%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 60%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands