10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 860 has a better rating of 86% compared to 52% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /52%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /86%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
79%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 73%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
81%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 78%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
65%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
73%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
73%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 62%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
84%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ? dB

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
70%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
64%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Still recommended	7,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	9,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2-	3+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,1	2,9	2,3	3,6	1,0	1,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	2,1	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,0	2,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO	34,3	29,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands