14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

65%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

77%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands