Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Falken (44%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 54% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak 6 and the EuroWinter HS02 Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak 6 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Satisfactory
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Very good | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | ||
Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Good | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.0 | ||
Show test details |