14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (33%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 33% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the MP93 Nordicca were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Matador MP93 Nordicca /33%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 89

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 15.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 28

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.5%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

60.7%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.9%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

67.3%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92.8%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

77%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.6%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75.2%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Matador MP93 Nordicca	38,6	-
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Matador MP93 Nordicca	37,8
Show test details