Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kleber (73%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 73% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /73%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/84%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

/73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R19

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 107

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 23x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 7.3

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2023

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Dry braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Dry handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 67%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

85%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 91%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 85%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

Comfort

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

71%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

Price/value

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	2	2
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Rating	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	dobré	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2.4	2.7
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2.4	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	vítěz testu	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2-	2-	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2	1-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2-	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	1-	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2	2	2+	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2+	2-	1-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2+	3+	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands