Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Barum Polaris 3 4x4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Barum Polaris 3 4x4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Polaris 3 4x4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 has C rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
