14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian Powerproof

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 66% compared to 52% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Advantage and the Powerproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings.

#	BFGoodrich Advantage /66%	Nokian Powerproof /52%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R17 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Nokian Powerproof 53

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Nokian Powerproof 11x

Best position in test

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Nokian Powerproof 2022

Best rating in test

1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian Powerproof A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

77%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

81%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian Powerproof ?

2. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich Advantage C

2. Nokian Powerproof C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2-	2+	2-
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended	1-	2	3-
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,3	31
Nokian Powerproof	35,7	28,9
Show test details