Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Vredestein (71%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the Comtrac 2 Winter were tested.
# | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2,6 | 2,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |