Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Yokohama (59%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the W.drive V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
Yokohama W.drive V905 | 39,9 | 26,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3,9 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 4,0 | 3,5 | 2,4 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 42,9 | 28,8 | |||||
Yokohama W.drive V905 | 42,6 | 29,4 | |||||
Show test details |