Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 4x4 and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the Alpin 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin Alpin 5 has B rating.
# | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 0,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |