Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're comparing the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, two summer tyres from manufacturers Barum and Kleber, respectively. Both tyres have been put through a series of tests to evaluate their performance, durability, and overall quality.
The Barum Bravuris 5 HM showed slightly weaker test performance. Our ratings award it a score of 39% overall. Certain tests showed that this particular tyre might have some room for improvement. In the ADAC test, it ranked 15th out of 17, and it came in last place in the GTÜ test. However, despite some shortcomings, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM has good qualities worth being noted.
On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 performed relatively well in our tests, earning a score of 76% in our ratings. In the ADAC test, it landed a decent 11th place position – noticeably better than the Barum Bravo 5. Recognized for its low exterior noise, the Dynaxer HP4 also secured a remarkable first place in the GTÜ test. Autobild test positioned this tyre well above the competition, in the 14th place out of 53 tyres tested.
Specific pros and cons stand out for each tyre. Dynaxer HP4's strengths lie in its good performance on dry roads and low fuel consumption, as emphasized in the ADAC 2021 testing summary. Conversely, it has slightly increased wear and difficulty performing on wet roads. Autobild 2020 test noted the Dynaxer HP4's environmental balance, mileage, and efficiency, but pointed out its slight imbalance and weaknesses on wet roads.
Finally, it's worth noting that neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model. Both are still relevant and efficient choices depending on your specific needs.
To summarize, while each tyre has its strengths and weaknesses, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to have a better performance record overall. However, the right tyre for you ultimately depends on specific individual requirements and preferences.
In conclusion, both the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and Kleber Dynaxer HP4 offer commendable performances, but the Dynaxer HP4 stands out as the better overall tyre based on its test results and feedback.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,9 | 3,2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 49 | 35 | 18 | 5 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 | |
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 39,0 | 33,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
