Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 50% of the Apollo Aspire XP Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Aspire XP Winter
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 2,0 | ||||
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,9 | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,7 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 37,2 | 33,0 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |