Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Apollo Alnac 4G and Fulda EcoControl HP2 are summer tyres from manufacturers Apollo Tyres and Fulda, respectively.
The Apollo Alnac 4G tyre is a relatively below-average performer with an overall rating of 46%. ADAC test ranks the Apollo Alnac 4G 6th out of 15 tyres. In the Autobild 2024 test, the tyre received mixed feedback. While it was praised for its efficiency, it was criticized for being unbalanced, weaknesses on both dry and wet roads, and having an average environmental footprint. Also, the tyre was noted for having a relatively low mileage and substantial wear. The Apollo Tyres manufacturer has not replaced this model with a newer one.
On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 tyre performed relatively well with a rating of 71%. ADAC test ranks the tyre 8th, with its best features being cross aquaplaning and noise. An Autobild test showed that the EcoControl HP2 is strong in the area of environmental balance, mileage, wear, and efficiency but was highlighted for some weaknesses on wet roads. The Fulda manufacturer has not released a newer model to replace the EcoControl HP2.
Through a direct comparison of these tyres' performances in tests, it can be seen that the Fulda EcoControl HP2 outperforms the Apollo Alnac 4G in most of the categories. Despite Fulda's slight weakness on wet roads, its outstanding performance in other important factors such as environmental sustainability, mileage, and wear resistance makes it the preferable tyre overall.
In conclusion, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. Apollo Alnac 4G is a good choice for drivers looking for efficiency, while Fulda EcoControl HP2 would be more ideal for drivers who prioritize environmental sustainability and long tyre life. However, the overall performance rating and test results indicate that the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a better option between the two.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.752. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,5 | 3,0 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | ||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
