Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Laufenn (36%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 65% compared to 8% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the i*Fit + LW31 were tested.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
