14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Toyo Celsius AS2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

Looking for a comparison of Toyo Celsius AS2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

#	Toyo Celsius AS2 /54%	Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 /52%	Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ /52%	Kleber Dynaxer HP4 /76%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /78%	Gt Radial Fe2 /0%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /87%	Michelin Primacy 4+ /77%	Bridgestone Turanza 6 /83%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R15 - R20	R17 - R22	R14 - R17	R14 - R18	R14 - R18	R14 - R20	R16 - R21	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove

Segment

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

7. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

8. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost

9. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 190

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 124

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 122

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 120

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 109

6. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 108

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88

8. Toyo Celsius AS2 70

9. Gt Radial Fe2 38

Number of tests

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 11x

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 9x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 9x

6. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6x

7. Gt Radial Fe2 4x

8. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 4x

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 2x

Best position in test

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

6. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 5.

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

8. Gt Radial Fe2 11.

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 14.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 6.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 8.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

8. Gt Radial Fe2 22.

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 39.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.27

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 5.33

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 5.5

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.78

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.22

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

8. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 25

Year of the last test

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 2025

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2024

3. Gt Radial Fe2 2024

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2024

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2024

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 2024

8. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 2024

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended

5. Gt Radial Fe2 Good

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

7. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Good

8. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory

9. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Good

5. Gt Radial Fe2 Good

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Good

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

76%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

75%

Gt
Radial Fe2

75%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro+

72%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

72%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

67%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

62%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

58%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 85%

2. Gt Radial Fe2 80%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

6. Kleber Quadraxer 3 64%

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 57%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 56%

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 33%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 82%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 80%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 76%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 74%

5. Gt Radial Fe2 75%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

7. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 70%

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 59%

Wet braking

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 73%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

6. Gt Radial Fe2 69%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

8. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 68%

9. Toyo Celsius AS2 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 82%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 74%

4. Gt Radial Fe2 74%

5. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 64%

8. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 58%

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 56%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 84%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 81%

5. Gt Radial Fe2 79%

6. Kleber Quadraxer 3 74%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 74%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 63%

9. Toyo Celsius AS2 62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

5. Gt Radial Fe2 ?

6. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

9. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

86%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro+

67%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

57%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

?

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

?

Gt
Radial Fe2

?

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

?

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

?

Snow traction

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 62%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 51%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

7. Gt Radial Fe2 0%

8. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 0%

Snow handling

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 62%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 59%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

7. Gt Radial Fe2 0%

8. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 0%

Snow braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 79%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

7. Gt Radial Fe2 0%

8. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

90%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

80%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

80%

Gt
Radial Fe2

75%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

70%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

70%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro+

62%

Dry handling

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 85%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 80%

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 74%

6. Gt Radial Fe2 71%

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 69%

8. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 68%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 66%

Dry braking

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

5. Gt Radial Fe2 80%

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 75%

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 74%

8. Bridgestone Turanza 6 72%

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 56%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

86%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

81%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro+

80%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

79%

Gt
Radial Fe2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

65%

Exterior noise

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 83%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 81%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 76%

6. Gt Radial Fe2 74%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

8. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 71%

9. Bridgestone Turanza 6 68%

Comfort

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 88%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 87%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

5. Gt Radial Fe2 79%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 73%

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ ?

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

5. Gt Radial Fe2 ?

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4+

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

79%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

73%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

72%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

72%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70%

Gt
Radial Fe2

68%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro+

55%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 93%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 78%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

6. Gt Radial Fe2 65%

7. Toyo Celsius AS2 66%

8. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 55%

9. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

Mileage

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 72%

5. Gt Radial Fe2 72%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 66%

8. Kleber Quadraxer 3 62%

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 0%

Price/value

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 90%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 75%

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 66%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 54%

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

7. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

8. Gt Radial Fe2 0%

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

6. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

7. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

8. Gt Radial Fe2 ?

9. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: tyres similar to Toyo Celsius AS2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands