• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Nokian Powerproof

Looking for a comparison of Nokian Powerproof to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Nokian Powerproof
/51%
Firestone Roadhawk
/59%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
/64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/68%
Falken Azenis FK510
/71%
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
/44%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
/59%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
/39%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Firestone
Uniroyal
Kumho
BFGoodrich
Falken
Matador
Semperit
Barum
DimensionsR17 - R20 R15 - R21 R15 - R21 R16 - R22 R14 - R20 R17 - R22 R13 - R20 R15 - R21 R14 - R21
Price
Remove

When it comes to summer tyres, two notable contenders in the field are the Nokian Powerproof and Firestone Roadhawk. Both have performed well in our tyre tests, with overall ratings of 71% and 72% respectively, but how do they stack against each other in various aspects? Let’s examine these summer tyres based on various tests and give a verdict on their strengths and weaknesses.


Starting off with the Nokian Powerproof, a summer tyre proudly made in Finland. The Powerproof holds a commendable second position out of 50 tyres tested by Autobild. The best features highlighted in this test include Dry braking, Wet braking, and Wet braking, showing the excellent control over various weather conditions. Additionally, Autobild 2022 commends Powerproof for its good aquaplaning properties and convincing dynamic wet handling. However, the tyre falls a bit short in the area of delayed steering response and stability on dry roads, and it has limited mileage. It also has a relatively high price, which might be a factor when considering overall value.


On the other hand, Firestone Roadhawk, another summer tyre, stands at the 11th position out of 50 in the same Autobild 2022 testing. Unfortunately, the test summary for this tyre isn't as detailed as for Powerproof's, and specific strengths and weaknesses were not provided. However, it must be noted that ranking 11th out of 50, is a good indicator of its strong overall performance.


When the overall performance is considered regarding our ranking percentage, Firestone Roadhawk edges slightly over the Nokian Powerproof with a 72% to the Nokian’s 71%. However, depending on specific needs and uses, potential buyers might want to consider Powerproof's better wet handling and braking or Roadhawk's presumably higher mile performance.


In conclusion, both Nokian Powerproof and Firestone Roadhawk exhibited great performance in the summer tyre category. The optimal choice between them will rest substantially on the buyer’s specific needs, driving conditions, and budget constraints.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Nokian Powerproof35,7 28,9
Firestone Roadhawk37,732,8
Uniroyal RainSport 538,433,5
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Semperit Speed-Life 34033,1
Barum Bravuris 5 HM4033,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné11-1
Nokian Powerproof
Rating: Good
dobré1-2+2-
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
dobré2+22-
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno1 23-
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 221-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
Nokian Powerproof32,929,1
Firestone Roadhawk34,330,8
Kumho Ecsta PS7134,929
Falken Azenis FK5103630,7
Matador MP47 Hectorra 33635,7
Barum Bravuris 5 HM37,736,1
Show test details