205/55 R16 Debica Presto HP2 variants
Debica Presto HP2 is a summer tyre made in total of 16 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 205/55 R16 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (185) and 10mm narrower than the widest one (215). This tyre profile of 55 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 55% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 112.75mm sidewall height. In 205/55 R16, there are 3 possible speed indexes for Debica Presto HP2 - "V","W","H", which are good for speeds up to 240, 270, 210 km/h. In 205/55 R16, Presto HP2 usually competes against EcoControl HP2, which is a tyre from Fulda with a rating of 71%, compared to 79% of the Debica in question. Latest test in 205/55 R16 was held by Autobild in 2021, where Presto HP2 received rating "Exemplary" and finished on the 4. place. It was tested on a VW Golf.
205/55 R16 91 V
205/55 R16 91 W
205/55 R16 91 H
Debica Presto HP2 is made in 16 sizes, starting from 185/65 R15 up to 215/60 R17.
Similar tires
Debica Presto HP2 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/55 R16)
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
good
Ranked #15 of 50
The Debica Presto HP2 secured the 15th spot out of 50 participants, demonstrating commendable performance with a final rating of 'Good.' It was praised for its environmental footprint, longevity, wear resistance, and efficiency, showcasing strengths in predicted mileage and low fuel consumption alongside minimal weight. However, its performance was marked by some inconsistencies, notably in driving safety. The tire struggled to provide balanced feedback on dry roads, making it challenging to adjust steering angles intuitively for curves and achieving only satisfactory ratings in handling limits and braking distances. Similarly, on wet surfaces, while it showed good resistance to aquaplaning, its braking and handling capabilities received only satisfactory marks. The tire managed to deliver a medium grip level but found it difficult to effectively combine longitudinal and lateral forces, which limited its overall safety ratings. Despite these drawbacks, its contributions to fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact were significant highlights in its evaluation.
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 2,3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
