Table of contents:
225/55 R17 Debica Frigo HP2 variants
No
No
Debica Frigo HP2 is a winter tyre made in total of 25 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 225/55 R17 is 30mm wider than the narrowest dimension (195) and 0mm narrower than the widest one (225). This tyre profile of 55 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 55% of the tyre width (225mm), which results in 123.75mm sidewall height. In 225/55 R17, there is only one possible speed index for Debica Frigo HP2 - "V", which is good for speeds up to 240 km/h. In 225/55 R17, Frigo HP2 usually competes against Kristall Control HP2, which is a tyre from Fulda with a rating of 59%, compared to 57% of the Debica in question.
Debica Frigo HP2 is made in 25 sizes, starting from 195/55 R15 up to 225/45 R18.
Similar tires
Debica Frigo HP2 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (225/55 R17)
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18
conditionally recommended
Ranked #18 of 20
The Debica Frigo HP2 concluded its evaluation in a competitive field, securing the 18th position among 20 participants. While it was acknowledged for its commendable winter capabilities and favorable cost efficiency, certain deficits marred its overall performance. Critics highlighted concerns regarding its extended braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, a tendency toward understeer in dry conditions, and an increased rolling resistance. These factors contributed to the tyre receiving a final rating of 'Conditionally recommended.' Despite these criticisms, it's important to note that no specific disciplines were identified where the tyre either excelled as the absolute best or lagged as the least performing.
conditionally recommended
Ranked #18 of 20
The Debica Frigo HP2 concluded its evaluation in a competitive field, securing the 18th position among 20 participants. While it was acknowledged for its commendable winter capabilities and favorable cost efficiency, certain deficits marred its overall performance. Critics highlighted concerns regarding its extended braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, a tendency toward understeer in dry conditions, and an increased rolling resistance. These factors contributed to the tyre receiving a final rating of 'Conditionally recommended.' Despite these criticisms, it's important to note that no specific disciplines were identified where the tyre either excelled as the absolute best or lagged as the least performing.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
