Segment
1. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (37%) than Zeetex (1%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 66% compared to 21% of the Zeetex WH 1000. The first tyre test of Zeetex WH 1000 was done in 2020, compared to 2024 when was the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WH 1000 and the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Zeetex WH 1000
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
2. Zeetex WH 1000 34.6
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Zeetex WH 1000 Rating: Sufficient | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Sufficient | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Zeetex WH 1000 | 42.3 | - | |||||
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
Show test details |