Segment
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama W.drive V905 and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the WR SUV 3 were tested.
| # | Yokohama W.drive V905
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | vítěz testu | 147 | 134 | 143 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 324 | (-) | 59 | 134 | 123 | ||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | velmi doporučeno | 131 | 128 | 131 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
