Segment
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Yokohama W.drive V905 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Yokohama W.drive V905
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |