Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium
Comparison: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Yokohama (38%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A and Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
| Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
