Comparison: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G900 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Yokohama (38%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama Geolandar H/T G900 and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Geolandar H/T G900 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G900
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
