Segment
1. Falken e.Ziex Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-XT was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R18 test, where both the BluEarth-XT and the e.Ziex were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the BluEarth-XT is made in Japan and e.Ziex is made in Turkey.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-XT
| Falken e.Ziex
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken e.Ziex Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Falken e.Ziex 61%
Wet braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Falken e.Ziex 68%
Wet handling
2. Falken e.Ziex 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Falken e.Ziex 95%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Falken e.Ziex 81%
Dry braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 88%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
1. Falken e.Ziex 78%
Exterior noise
2. Falken e.Ziex 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Yokohama BluEarth-XT Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 3 | |||
| Falken E.Ziex Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
