Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN also have B wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |