Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has a better rating of 65% compared to 55% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the BluEarth-Winter V906 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,0 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 3+ | 3 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 | 35,9 | 29,2 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
