Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has a better rating of 65% compared to 20% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the BluEarth-Winter V906 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has B wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating.
# | Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 | 35,9 | 29,2 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
Show test details |