Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter V905 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,2 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |