Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 146 | 134 | ||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 91 | 113 | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 125 | 133 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4 | 36,2 | 29,3 | |||||
Show test details |