Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Cooper (38%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Cooper Zeon CS8 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Zeon CS8 were tested.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Cooper Zeon CS8
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 39,1 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
