Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 146 | 134 | ||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 91 | 113 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 137 | 127 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
