Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | velmi doporučeno | 127 | 120 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 235 | 114 | 121 | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: - | 252 | Velmi doporučeno | 118 | 134 | |||
Show test details |