Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
| # | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The tyres we will be comparing today are the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. These two models are brought to us by well-established manufacturers, Yokohama and Hankook, respected in the industry for high-quality, reliable tyres.
The Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 is a summer tyre, although it fails to bring a notable rating to highlight its performance. In Autozeitung's comparative test of 20 tyres, this Yokohama model ranked in the 11th place, with its dry steering response being noted as the best feature. However, it fell further behind in the Autobild's ranking, coming in 13th out of 50 tyres.
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is a summer tyre that carries a strong rating of 75%. This model comes as the first equipment with the Citroën C3 Aircross and is manufactured in Hungary. In contrast to the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the Hankook tyre demonstrated strong performances in tests conducted by both Autozeitung and Autobild, ranking 5th and 2nd respectively. The notable features of Hankook's performance included dry braking and dry handling abilities.
Verdict
When looking at the overall comparison, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 stands out as an excellent choice given its outstanding performance in both tests and high user rating. Its strengths lie in its good performance under dry conditions, with excellent dry braking and handling properties. This tyre has also been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, an even newer model that promises to maintain the same quality standards.
However, the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 lags behind in terms of test performance and user rating. The primary strength that stood out in the tests was its dry steering responsiveness, which although is a crucial aspect, might not be enough to compensate for the overall performance. There is no information regarding a replacement for this model, which could be interpreted that this model is seen as fulfilling Yokohama's offering in this range.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Highly recommended | 240 | velmi doporučeno | 111 | 129 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 37,7 | 40,2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
