14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /83%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 261

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 70%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

98%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

86%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 78%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 93%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

84%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Exterior noise

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 85%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

Comfort

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	264	137	129
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	199	77	122
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner	264	vítěz testu	137	127
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2019 235/45 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	277	142	135
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	235	114	121
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: -	277	Vítěz testu	142	135
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands