Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 vs. Fulda MultiControl
Table of contents:
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 (from the manufacturer Yokohama) and the Fulda MultiControl (born from Fulda) are two all-round tyres designed to meet the broad needs of drivers across various driving conditions and styles. Let's dive into the details to help discern which might be the best choice for your needs.
Firstly, it's worth mentioning that neither of these tyres got replaced by a newer model, so the information here is up-to-date and relevant.
Examining the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21, we find a tyre that offers reasonable performance among peers in its category. Our rating had it sitting at 31% - not the leader of the pack, but a fair contender nonetheless. According to a comparison test carried out by Autobild, this tyre secured the 15th position out of 31 total tyres tested. These results corroborate our own observations and rating, painting a picture of a decently reliable tyre.
On the other hand, the Fulda MultiControl underperformed in the same Autobild test, only managing the 28th position out of the 31 tyres. Unfortunately, this correlates to a 0% rating from us, indicating poor performance and leaving room for improvement for this tyre.
In terms of their strengths, the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 stands out for its fair consistency and reliability in various conditions, making it a feasible choice for everyday use. Its middle-of-the-road rating indicates its adequacy for general, all-round driving.
In contrast, the main weakness of Fulda MultiControl should be taken into consideration when making your selection. Its lower ranking and 0% rating, unfortunately, hint at subpar performance for an all-round tyre.
In conclusion, in their mutual test positions, the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 overtakes the Fulda MultiControl, boasting a better reliability and performance. So, based on the combined data from all the tests, it's safe to say that the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 could be a stronger choice if you're seeking an all-round tyre. However, it's important to consider other factors such as your specific driving conditions and preferences before making a final decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda MultiControl 22.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 42.9 | 52.4 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44.2 | 54.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44 | 52,9 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44,5 | 54,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44,1 | 52,1 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
