Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Advan Sport V105 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
# | Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
Show test details |