Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Advan Sport V105 and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
# | Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
Show test details |