Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Advan Fleva V701 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
# | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 1- | 1 | |||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | |||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,3 | 35,7 | |||||
Show test details |