Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
# | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 and Fulda SportControl 2 are both summer tyres produced by respective manufacturers, Yokohama and Fulda, worthy of comparison. Both of these tyres have been put up against each other in various tyre tests, uncovering strengths and weaknesses for potential buyers.
The Advan Fleva V701 is a tyre from Yokohama's catalogue that doesn't have any previous models or replacing models. In fact, our site does not currently have a rating for the Advan Fleva V701. But don't let this hold you back from considering this tyre as it possibly delivers good performance, and note that it still requires further testing.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2 has been more thoroughly tested and exhibits impressive performance, gaining a rating of 74% on our site. Like the Advan Fleva V701, the SportControl 2 does not have a model that directly replaces it or any previous models to compare to.
Looking into the Autobild test, which includes 52 total tyres, the Fulda SportControl 2 outperformed the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, taking the 9th place while the latter landed in the 15th position. This is quite significant, pinpointing the SportControl 2 as a highly competitive tyre on the market.
The performance of the SportControl 2 attributes to its strong resistance to Aquaplaning, in both longitudinal and cross directions — making it an exceptionally safe choice for all drivers.
Yet, it is important to note that as the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is less tested, the tyre's full potential is yet to be uncovered, and it could yield favorable results in future tests. Despite this, as things stand presently, the Fulda SportControl 2 comes out as the potentially better tyre in this comparison, due to its higher ranking in the test and revealing excellent Aquaplaning resistance.
The decision between these two tyres ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the driver, both the Advan Fleva V701 and the SportControl 2 has characteristics which are appealing and could be suitable for varying driving conditions and styles.
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 1- | 1 | |||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | |||
Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
Show test details |